Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Advanced Audio Settings Changes - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I just want to scan and hear my probe scanning sound and not listen to ui clicks when i just move my mouse. Please
- by Lt Shard - at 2017.05.09 20:52:44
|
2. Sticky:[May] CONCORD Aerospace Promotional Ships - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Lt Shard wrote: "Their DPS isn't anything special " This is an understatement. Maybe bump it up a touch, like bonuses from 5% to 7.5% According to Fozzie, they are meant to be underpowered. He never precised at wha...
- by Lt Shard - at 2017.04.28 06:09:11
|
3. Sticky:[May] CONCORD Aerospace Promotional Ships - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
"Their DPS isn't anything special " This is an understatement. Maybe bump it up a touch, like bonuses from 5% to 7.5%
- by Lt Shard - at 2017.04.25 20:06:38
|
4. Weapon Accuracy Score- Why. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I dont understand it. Tracking is just some arbitrary number now. How does it scale? Does it cap? Linearly? 100? ****, man The only thing I can compare it to is other weapon scores. I used to be able to compare the old readout of rad/s to the rea...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.07.06 01:48:34
|
5. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Pryce Caesar wrote: I imagine that Vehements would be the main command ship for moderate-sized fleets (I'm judging big fleets by B-R5RB), with plenty of support to keep them alive while they rain down the heavy weapons fire on anything unfort...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.07.06 01:33:04
|
6. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: If you all don't think this is worth the price tag then... don't fly them? People said the same thing about the Revenant and it still took less than six months for someone to pop one, let alone build one. Not everything...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.30 02:41:53
|
7. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: Better in most ways Oh shut up.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.29 02:43:16
|
8. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: win hole-fights with one less Dread needed. Lmao no Why would they / I use it over something that requires absolutely no cap to run its tank and guns Also cap escalations are dead.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.28 23:36:27
|
9. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: These ships are pretty much outright better than their Gallente counterparts so I'm really not sure what you're on about... The moros is in a bad position in the meta right now. A small bit of dps and web bonus isnt r...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.28 21:20:03
|
10. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cade Windstalker wrote: These aren't intended to be cost-effective or in common use... Yeah, introducing ships no one will used because they cost far too much are are outright worse then current ships of its class is a good idea.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.28 19:17:10
|
11. Sticky:[118.6] Serpentis Capitals - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Whats up with the production cost on the dreadnought? 30-40b? You could buy a super for that money and be ten times more effective. And its still outclassed by a nag or phoenix. Consider 2 or 3 times the mats for a moros, please.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.28 01:40:35
|
12. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nicholas Vierra wrote: As a new player I did not find out about the IGB untill I clicked a link in Local chat... It was a Porn Link. I did not use it again until my CEO linked me to some tools like Dotlan, which worked better for me out of ga...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.21 00:09:14
|
13. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: . But whipping out the 'CCP doesn't love us, the sky is falling, we're doomed' line of argument demolishes any credibility here, so try again. i love strawmanning!
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 23:51:05
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: Lt Shard wrote: Marsha Mallow wrote: Not quite sure what all the outrage is about. People who use the IGB upset when a feature is unnecessarily removed instead of ccp managing their development properly? Don't re...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 23:31:50
|
15. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Airi Cho wrote: Lt Shard wrote: Marsha Mallow wrote: Not quite sure what all the outrage is about. People who use the IGB upset when a feature is unnecessarily removed instead of ccp managing their development properly? fixed it for...
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 23:16:07
|
16. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: So please, don't give me this "CCP doesn't care" crap because it is complete garbage. I too, remember Incarna, and leaked Hilmar letters.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 22:58:48
|
17. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Marsha Mallow wrote: Not quite sure what all the outrage is about. People who use the IGB upset when a feature is unnecessarily removed instead of ccp managing their development properly?
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 22:50:12
|
18. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: Lt Shard wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: That isn't really a simple task unfortunately. Doesn't mean you cant try. True, but it is a matter of prioritization. So many things we want to do and a limited number of devs....
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 22:34:15
|
19. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
KaarBaak wrote: The IGB isn't "content." Its a feature, which still falls under his argument.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 22:33:19
|
20. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bidding Farewell to the In-game Browser - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: That isn't really a simple task unfortunately. Doesn't mean you cant try.
- by Lt Shard - at 2016.06.20 22:22:33
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |